Toolkit/Performance
09 / Performance

DOTS, IPF GL & Wilks Score

Compare a powerlifting total across bodyweights using DOTS and IPF GL Points, with Wilks shown as legacy rather than as the default.

The Stat Method INSTRUMENTLIVE IN BROWSERNO ACCOUNT · INPUTS STAY LOCAL
Before you calculate
  1. 01Enter your bodyweight and your best successful attempt at each lift.
  2. 02Set equipment and event to match your competition category.
  3. 03Compare the three scores — but only against others using the same system.
What the terms mean
Total
Squat plus bench plus deadlift — best successful attempt at each.
DOTS
A 2019 scoring formula that adjusts a total for bodyweight. Current standard for many federations.
IPF GL
IPF Goodlift points — the official IPF system since May 2020.
Wilks
The long-standing scoring formula, now largely superseded.
Classic / raw
Lifted without supportive equipment beyond a belt and sleeves.
01 / RUN THE INSTRUMENTCALCULATE · CHECK · UNDERSTAND
Your lifts
kg
Competition lifts best successful attempt
kg
kg
kg
Total520 kg6.30× bodyweight
Relative strength score
352.2
DOTS

Intermediate range — DOTS is the current standard for most federations outside the IPF.

All three systems
DOTSDefault352.2
The scale USA Powerlifting uses, alongside USPA, WRPF and others from 2020. Fixes bias at extreme bodyweights. Note: USAPL additionally applies a McCulloch age coefficient for Masters and Junior lifters, which this tool does not — open-category only.
IPF GL Points72.2
Official IPF system since 1 May 2020, replacing IPF Points.
WilksLegacy348.4
The standard for ~25 years. Documented bias at very low and very high bodyweights.
Total
520kg
Bodyweight
82.5kg
× bodyweight
6.30
Band
Intermediate

Note that IPF GL points are on a different scale entirely — roughly 100 represents an elite result, where DOTS and Wilks both run in the hundreds. Compare each system only against itself.

Method & sources

DOTS (Konertz, 2019) was built on modern competition data to correct known biases in Wilks at very light and very heavy bodyweights. USPA, WRPF and others adopted it from 2020.

IPF GL Points became the IPF's official system on 1 May 2020, replacing IPF Points. It uses separate coefficients for each combination of sex, equipment and event.

Wilks was the global standard for roughly 25 years and is shown here as legacy, because many older records and personal benchmarks are still expressed in it. If your federation has not specified a system, DOTS is the safer modern default.

IPF GL coefficients, International Powerlifting Federation (2020) · Konertz T, DOTS (2019) · Wilks R (1994)

02 / READING THE RESULT

What these numbers
actually tell you.

01

The three scales are not comparable

IPF GL points run to roughly 100 for an elite result, while DOTS and Wilks run in the hundreds. A GL of 72 and a DOTS of 352 can describe the same lifter. Never compare a number from one system against another.

02

Why DOTS is the default here

Wilks was the global standard for about twenty-five years but has documented bias at very light and very heavy bodyweights. DOTS was built on modern competition data to correct that, and USPA, WRPF and others adopted it from 2020. Wilks is retained because many older records and personal benchmarks are still expressed in it — but if your federation has not specified, DOTS is the safer modern choice.

03

What the bands mean

Roughly, under 200 DOTS is beginner territory, 300 novice, 375 intermediate, 450 advanced and 525 elite. These are orientation, not federation classifications, and they say nothing about how long you have trained or what your potential is.

KEEP THE TOOLS OPEN

Free, no account, nothing stored. A one-off tip helps cover hosting and keeps the site ad-light.

♦ Support The Stat Method